MSN Slate's "Specter Resurrected"

I just can't do it. I just can't swear unswerving fealty to a Bush. The Supreme Court case, the one over n American Flag, instantly, patriotically, loyally, arises in my mind. There in Washington (the State) a native American I think was fined $75 for having a flag in his sixth floor window, a group of protesters arrived out in the street, because the man had placed electrical tape on the flag in the shape of the circular "Peace" symbol, which I read is based on two other flags, an "N" and a "D" in semaphore, as it was, people used to communicate to each other before electronics, by waving flags at each other. Well, a few people, I think went to court and each of the courts upheld the fine. So on to the Supreme Court it went, in and around the 1970's (the undeclared "war" was ending) and so there case went (in Washington the city). Well, they overturned the "Washington Court of Appeals" (did I tell you that's a state in the Union?) and found that the defendant was within his Constitutional rights of free speech to have had some tape on the American flag on the sixth floor in a window, there I think, it was, in Seattle. Further posting: Subject: RE: Specter Resurrected From: GeorgeJMyersJr-2 Date: Nov 20 2004 6:08PM "N" NUCLEAR "D" DISARMAMENT (THE BUSHES DID NOT INVENT THE MOVEMENT) I don't know what he should do maybe refer to the "The Sorcerer of Bolinas Reef" Charles Reich (a former Supreme Court assistant and author of "The Greening of America") for direction and perhaps place more emphasis on a judicial committee than one man's P.O.V. A strict Constitutionalist like Bork would I think even agree, no one person in the Constitution can create law. CA - Nov 3, 2004 (PRN): The youngest Political Party in the Land has taken credit for the defeat of former Democratic Party Senate Minority Leader, Tom Daschle and recognized that President Bush has been retained by the America people. See: http://www.pressreleasenetwork.com/prnindex.phtml?link=newsroom/news_view.phtml?news_id=1029 Also, if you ever saw a list of the various crimes and misdemeanors that any one Congress (at least in the past, the 109th might be all saints) you might have second thoughts about the quality of either a) candidates or b) law enforcement. I have seen such a list in circulation which list offenses (past) but no names just titles loosely i.e., the House or the Senate.